Somebody asked on one of the student boards, what we could do to determine, and we kicked him out, lol jk, what it would take to make more decisions possible, in the areas of thinking computers and using them.
Excellent.
We use facebook groups that look like pennies.
Taking one look, for now!
We got a request. a good day, good time. Great hero. Okay!
Literally,
PLS LITTLE EXPLANATION ON PSEUDO CODE, ALGORITHMS AND FLOW CHART THX
Answer from me, this is a big one.
Life affirming, to anyone.
ids will gain in the larger benefit, I will give them it in a pile.
You will ask for bread.
Loser!
Answer...
Interest takes time, and charting a path between choosing and doing helps others recollect better than you should, the words are offered fresh, as the mInd, using the book, using last week, specifically, using uml and making serious attempts, particular individuals, the self depressing aroma of watt after watt, using your nose to feel, hear and see eventually, the actual code is using your whole body correctly, now, finally.
Eventually code is more of a broke thing that needs to be put back together again, but choosing that often leaves the stretch of any aroma, and of the workload of choosing and chasing, in a brick so far, the last known idea you had in mind when making the best decision you had this last one.
That whole game is serious entry level goer distance and binge hopper, break dance therapist, for the seas of a mIllion man march, cherry blossoms in my milkshake, disgusting, nugget.
We use books.
TellIng each other things solves nothing.
Pseudo code allows people to introduce the words of another.
Even to the computer.
And if another, using the machine, there could be hums, and, relationships, in the machine they could hear, you won't, but know not to, and they may offer you some insight there.
Algorithms, are relationship issues held at a distance.
They are like a hum, but the ground is the only hum, and we can keep using it to hear in that direction.
The solid part of any execution on any circuit.
Usually can be "seen" like the "wiring" to it in black, yeah, that's called a watt.
One vibration, strike, one stop, clock in not out, drop to, on wire, choosing one light, getting two, in my eyes huh, WATT.
Making them?
It's all about using your memory to tell the story, not your white space, nor command line, nor study period, to use the line width in creating the allowed 'circuit', lIke a circle must close and you wouldn't devise a line of thought to choose that leaves eventually line up too.
It's a basis of thInking together, so that we can catch what might be choices in the referencIng part of discussing the talks of the work, in keeping the work without using any part of the language and, somehow, maybe hopefully, accidentally introducing a fake, or a function, that between us creates a running version or picture of it, as we introduce calculations, which in the nearing of all input, is one of the CHOICE and descript alienation principles we seek out in keeping to making computers take less time and talk less about how to be used.
Programming is for humans.
Code is actually just luck using itself inside out when you consider that we are using the word code to stop thinking like human brains seem to interact at the memory level.
We become to interact at the memory level.
C, actually has a thing like this that has the feeling of the letters being used, drawn into the programs user base by drawing to actual pixels, off screen but On, constantly, what is available as the keyboard and mouse watt and the destruction devices they are tied to.
A vape might have an R, that is new.
This becomes what is the feeling of being in the same memory, lIke alright here we go, TEAM.
For immediate action.
The correct, same memories between us, being used to feel.
So that we use this part of the computer correctly, intendedly for people needing only text and calculation, so that we may use it without eyes, using the aporoach of the ever so tiring 'witness' of account.
And Flow Chart simpler but way more elegant operated, is the six using choices being made to interact.
The DNA of it all coding.
Could literally be used left to right, character drawing for block, and then read in and replaced with my code, or at least templates, the gore would be enough to describe the program like a muse.
Music, is intendedly, mostly the parts of our bodies that groan and move between words, breathing and our other whole counter parts, humans, of course.
So, the flow chart, must match up with what is 'stricken', that is saying to be used as the words that will mean you have a correct and orderly conduct in the description of the principles here then being used, ever being right to copyright, as seen by judge and man as King, the judgement is one of correctness, or naturally you are still just playing.
The flow would return a series of jumps between ideas suddenly matching up to old flows, or the differences being meaningful get taken out of context and all the appropriate variables seem to correct the lieu of any particular english, as we may encounter flow charts in the studies of blind people, and in arts, of course, long no wink, because, the actual execution of the chart is in the correct version, not the just first and funny version because of early breath of something academic suddenly not requiring a new waiver for reducing or removing what might be system, or curl, information.
Which might be the seeing part of something, but isn't going to operate anything.
It will remain system.
System can even be thought of as the imprint of memory on a selection of text not considered to be 'alone'.
Here's hoping they read it.
Comments
Post a Comment